Second Circuit Court Finds That Excess Carrier’s Participation in Settlement May Make Declaratory Judgment Moot

Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.v. RGIS Inventory Specialists, LLC

(2nd Cir., December 11, 2009)

 

After a district court granted summary judgment against an excess insurer regarding whether it received timely notice of an underlying personal injury claim, the excess carrier appealed to the Second Circuit.  While the appeal was pending, the excess insurer contributed $4.0 million towards settlement of the underlying personal injury claims.  As a result, the named insured and underlying claimants argued the appeal was moot in that the insurer could not

Continue Reading

Summary Judgment Sought for Insurers’ Delay in Asserting Defenses

Hinkle v. The North River Ins. Co.

(D. Alaska December 4, 2009)

 

The owners of property on which a dry cleaning business was operated seek a declaratory judgment against the prior owners’ insurers, preventing them from denying coverage for claims plaintiffs made against the prior owners to recover for costs the state of Alaska assessed against plaintiffs to clean up the property.

 

In 1999, the insurers agreed to defend the prior owners under a reservation of rights, saying they could not locate the

Continue Reading

Court of Appeals Affirms Decision For Insurer Holding Doctor’s Wife Was A Medical Assistant Under The Statute And Therefore Was Providing Professional Services Precluding Coverage Under The Professional Services Exclusion

The Estate of Steven Tinervin v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.

(Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District, November 25, 2009)

Plaintiff appealed an adverse declaratory judgment in favor of the insurer, wherein the trial court found that the professional services exclusion of a business owner’s policy excluded coverage for services performed by the doctor’s wife in filing, and making the doctor aware of lab reports, knowledge of which, would have changed his treatment strategies.

 

Specifically, the plaintiff brought a wrongful death action against the doctor,

Continue Reading

Court of Appeals Affirms Decision For Insurer Holding Doctor’s Wife Was A Medical Assistant Under The Statute And Therefore Was Providing Professional Services Precluding Coverage Under The Professional Services Exclusion

The Estate of Steven Tinervin v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.

(Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District, November 25, 2009)

Plaintiff appealed an adverse declaratory judgment in favor of the insurer, wherein the trial court found that the professional services exclusion of a business owner’s policy excluded coverage for services performed by the doctor’s wife in filing, and making the doctor aware of lab reports, knowledge of which, would have changed his treatment strategies.

 

Specifically, the plaintiff brought a wrongful death action against the doctor,

Continue Reading

Diet Pill Makers Seeking Coverage For Suits Alleging False Advertising

Basic Research v. Admiral Insurance Co. (D.C. Utah, November 30, 2009)

Policyholders, manufacturers and marketers of the weight loss pill Akavar 20/50, filed a suit in federal court seeking coverage for defense costs from their insurers for underlying cases accusing the policyholders of false advertising. 

 

Some of the policyholders were first sued in November 2007 in a putative nationwide class action in Utah alleging that the ads regarding weight loss were misleading.  In December 2007, the policyholders were hit with a similar

Continue Reading

Cases for CaseWatch: Insurance December 4, 2009 Edition

Cases Used with the Permission of Lexis

Download Berry & Murphy, P.C. v. Carolina Casualty Ins. Co. 

Download Brown v. J.B. Hunt Transportation Services 

Download City of Dillon v. Montana Municipal Ins. Auth. 

Download Eisenman v. GEICO 

Download Farmers Elevator, Inc. v. Hartford Life Ins. Co. 

Download Federal Ins. Co. v. Executive Coach Luxury Travel 

Download FountainCourt Homeowners' Assoc. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. 

Download Gutierrez v. Yochim 

Download Interstate Aerials, LLC v. Great American Ins.

Continue Reading