For a free copy, please click here.
If you would like to receive future editions of CaseWatch: Insurance directly by email, please contact Sarah Delaney at [email protected].…
Continue ReadingThe Insurance & Reinsurance Report
Your Timely Insurance and Reinsurance Analysis of Legal and Regulatory Developments and News.
For a free copy, please click here.
If you would like to receive future editions of CaseWatch: Insurance directly by email, please contact Sarah Delaney at [email protected].…
Continue ReadingCases provided courtesy of LexisNexis.
Alco Iron & Metal Co. v. Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co.
Aquarius Well Drilling, Inc., v. American States Ins. Co.
Colony Ins. Co. v. Kwasnik, Kanowitz & Associates, P.C.
Companion Prop. And Cas. Ins. Co. v. Moreno
Dean v. N.Y. Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y.
Everest Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Evanston Ins. Co.,
Fisher v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoefer
Ill. …
Continue ReadingSeveral thousand New Yorkers are receiving unexpected checks in the mail due to an investigation by the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) into life insurance claims practices. According to a DFS press release, regulators started investigating these practices in July 2011. Regulators found that insurers did not pay out life insurance benefits unless the beneficiary made a claim on the policy. The problem is this practice only works if the beneficiary actually knows that he, she, (or it) is a beneficiary. …
Continue ReadingFederal Register, Proposed Rulemaking, 26 CFR Parts 1, 54 and 301
In a proposed rulemaking, the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recognized a “margin of error” in proposing a 95 percent mandate for large employers in providing medical benefits to employees. The intention is to create leeway for oversights, inadvertent errors, and unique circumstances allowing the employer protection from financial penalties in these instances. In order to extend this flexibility to the smaller “large employers” (those with 50 or more …
The Prudential Insurance Company Of America ET AL. v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC et al.;
(2:12-cv-03489 U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey)
In April of 2012, the Prudential Insurance Company of America (the plaintiffs) filed suit against the J.P Morgan Securities, LLC, (the defendants) in New Jersey state court, claiming that the defendants made false statements and other misrepresentations in connection with $523 million in Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) purchased by Prudential between 2005 and 2007. The defendants moved to remove the …
Fisher v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
U.S.Sup.Ct.(2d Cir.) Nov. 13, 2012
The plaintiff’s ERISA claims in this action involved allegations that (1) the employer and director defendants negligently permitted plan participants to purchase and hold shares of JP Morgan common stock when it was imprudent to do so; (2) defendants failed to disclose and negligently misrepresented material facts to Plan participants; and (3) JP Morgan and the director defendants failed to appoint appropriate fiduciaries, monitor those fiduciaries, and supply them with the information necessary …
Continue ReadingBlue Shield of California v. Harlick
Petition for Writ of Cert from U.S. Ct. Apps. 9th Cir., (filed Oct. 10, 2012)
The Petition for Cert comes after the Ninth Circuits ruling that barred Blue Shield from considering on remand whether the plaintiff’s services were medically necessary. The court held that the ERISA plan had waived its right to conduct an investigation and to potentially make the medically necessary determination because it did not identify those specific grounds in its initial denial. Under this ruling, the …
For a free copy of CaseWatch Insurance, July 2012 edition, click here.
If you would like to receive CaseWatch Insurance directly via email, please contact Sarah Delaney at [email protected]…
Continue ReadingCases are provided with the permission of Lexis.
Ace Am. Ins. Co. V. Christiana Ins., LLC
Axis Surplus Ins. Co. v. Glencoe Ins. Ltd.
Beckman v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.
Cont’l Cas. Co. v. Law Offices of Melbourne Mills, Jr., PLLC
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Earthsoils, Inc.
Feldman Law Group v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,
Feldman Law Group, P.C. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Fulton County Emples. Ret. Sys. v. MGIC Inv. Corp.
Golinski v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management…
Continue Reading