That Sinking Feeling: Sinkhole Not Covered But Redesign Is

 

A lengthy rainstorm caused damage to three water basins designed to manage stormwater flow from buildings and parking lots near a shopping center. The increased flow of stormwater into the ground caused substantial sinkholes to form in two of the three basins. The insured repaired and filled the sinkholes but state officials issued an ordinance, requiring a redesign of the basins to prevent future sinkhole damage. The insured sought coverage for all damage arising out of the sinkholes. The insurer disclaimed coverage.

A New …

Continue Reading

“Personal and Advertising Injury” Coverage Insures Property Damage, Not Just Physical Harm

An Illinois appellate court recently held that insurance coverage for wrongful eviction claims, typically part of “personal and advertising injury” provided by Coverage B in CGL policies, includes coverage for property damage as a result of the eviction, not just physical harm to a person.

The insured property owners leased commercial space to a tenant who worked as an architect, painter, and sculptor. The tenant used the space as a rent storage and work space. During the lease term, the owners sold the space and, …

Continue Reading

Colorado Court Applies Massachusetts Law to Bar Coverage for Chinese Drywall

A Colorado state court applied Massachusetts law to deny an excess carrier’s summary judgment motion that sought to disclaim coverage for defective Chinese drywall claims.  Specifically, the court found that use of the term “pollutant” within the absolute pollution exclusion to be ambiguous “at this stage in the proceedings.”  In doing so, the court set the case up for trial.

The underlying claims giving rise to this coverage matter involve allegations that defective drywall, imported into the U.S. from China, was installed into homes.  It …

Continue Reading

California Court of Appeals says Insurers Do Not Have a Duty to Initiate Settlement

The issue involved in this case was the duty of an insurer to settle a third party claim within the policy limits when liability was clear and there was a substantial likelihood of a recovery in excess of the policy limits. Specifically, the question decided was whether an insurer must initiate settlement negotiations or offer its policy limits where the third party claimant has not made a demand or settlement offer. The trial court found that the insurer was not liable to the insured for …

Continue Reading

Old Republic Relies Upon Escape Clause To Partially Avoid Primary Coverage In Auto-Tractor-Trailer Accident

Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Old Republic Ins. Co.,
M.D. Fla. Sept. 27, 2013 (2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139251)

This declaratory judgment action arises from an underlying auto and tractor-trailer accident. At the time of the accident, the tractor was owned by Ryder Truck Rental, and the trailer was owned by an affiliate of Star Transportation Company and Star Distribution Systems, Inc. (collectively Star). The tractor was leased to Star pursuant to a Truck Lease and Service Agreement (TLSA). Ryder was insured under a business auto …

Continue Reading

Insurer on Hook for $10 Million in Investments With Madoff

Unites States Fire Ins. Co. v. Nine Thirty FEF Investments, LLC
Supreme Court of the State of New York: Commercial Part 48, October 1, 2013
The Supreme Court of the State of New York: Commercial Part 48 held that U.S. Fire Ins. Co was on the hook for approximately $10 million of investments deposited with Bernard Madoff. The court held that the losses caused by the Ponzi scheme were not barred from coverage by the dishonest securities brokering exclusion.

The defendants are private limited liability …

Continue Reading

Rule Followed by NY Federal Court for Damages Outside NY

Indian Harbor Insurance Company v. The City of San Diego 
(Case No. 12-cv-5787) (S.D.N.Y., September 25, 2013)

A New York federal court continued to honor the line of New York cases that stand for the proposition that a showing of prejudice is not required for the late notice defense on policies issued or delivered prior to January 17, 2009.

This case arose as a result of multiple underlying claims made against a California State municipality by two homeowners associations and a real estate construction company.  …

Continue Reading

Double Trouble: No Summary Judgment Where Trucking Company May Qualify as Insured Under Multiple Policies

Canal Ins. Co. v. Great W. Cas. Co.,
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133344, 1-2
(D. Minn. Sept. 18, 2013)


In this is a declaratory judgment action, the plaintiff Canal Insurance Company  (Canal) sought insurance coverage from the defendant, Great West Casualty Company (Great West), relating to an underlying trucking accident. In its complaint Canal admitted that the Canal policy provides coverage, but alleges that such coverage is excess to the primary coverage provided by the Great West policy. Great West moved for summary judgment, arguing

Continue Reading

Judicial Economy Requires Set-Off Rather Than Contribution Action By Non Settling Carriers

General Refractories Co. v. First State Ins. Co.,
September 6, 2013

The plaintiff, General Refractories Company (GRC), sued multiple defendant insurance carriers for a declaration of excess insurance coverage for underlying claims. Five of the defendant insurance carriers settled with GRC (settled carriers) but seven litigants remain (litigating defendants). Plaintiff GRC and the defendant settled carriers move for dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted against the settled carriers.

As the defendant insurance carriers would be jointly and severally liable for the loss claimed by …

Continue Reading

Despite Daily Visits, Home Considered Vacant for Vandalism Exclusion

New London County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Zachem
145 Conn. App. 160 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013)

The plaintiff insurance company sought a declaratory judgment to determine whether it had a duty to provide coverage under an insurance policy issued to the defendants for a claimed loss arising from an explosion and fire that destroyed a house they owned on September 8, 2008. No one had resided at the house since July, 2007, and an intruder broke into the house and removed a copper propane gas …

Continue Reading