CaseWatch: Insurance November 2011 Edition Now Available!

For a free copy, please click here.

If you would like to receive future editions of CaseWatch: Insurance directly by email, please contact Sarah Delaney at [email protected].

We also include the inaugural edition of the inaugural issue of The Appeals Attorneys, a new Goldberg Segalla newsletter that provides timely summaries and access to cases that the highest courts in New York (and soon Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) will address in the near future. For a freee copy, click here. If you would like …

Continue Reading

Reinsurance Agreement Between Insurer And Reinsurer Did Not Provide A Direct Cause Of Action Against Reinsurer For Underlying Environmental Claims

Canal Ins. Co. v. Montello, Inc. et. al. (United States District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma, September 26, 2011)

This environmental reinsurance action stems from the use of asbestos containing materials in the drilling mud distributed by Montello.  Specifically, Montello was the distributor of products used in the drilling industry.  One of its products was a drilling mud that contained asbestos.  Defendant Montello was sued by numerous individuals who were allegedly exposed to asbestos through Montello’s products.  Thereafter, Montello sought coverage from the group of

Continue Reading

NY Court Rejects Reinsurer’s Plea to Allow Lawsuit Against Bankrupt Insurer’s Liquidator

In re Liquidation of Midland Ins. Co.  (N.Y. App. Div. (1st Dept.) Aug. 25, 2011)

A New York appellate court recently refused to modify an injunction against bankrupt insurer Midland Insurance Company to permit its reinsurer to assert a breach-of-contract claim against its liquidator.

A New York court placed Midland in liquidation in 1986 and permanently enjoined the commencement and prosecution of all actions against it. Everest Reinsurance Company had entered into excess of loss reinsurance treaties and facultative reinsurance certificates with Midland for

Continue Reading

CLASS ACTION SUIT FILED REGARDING MEDICARE LIENS

Rebecca Meek-Horton v. Trover Solutions Inc. et al (State of New York, Supreme Court, New York County, Case No. 108804-2011)

 A lawsuit naming 50 insurers as defendants has been filed in New York Supreme Court, New York County.  The complaint relates to Medicare Advantage plans and accuses the insurers of violating a 2009 state law by imposing liens on patients who receive personal injury settlements.  The law bars insurers from pursuing liens on settlements absent statutory authorization, and questions exist regarding whether Medicare

Continue Reading

Federal Judge Slashes Reimbursement And Indemnification Claims In $82 Million Coverage Fight

Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. v. Flagstar Bank FSB, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

On July 7, 2011, New York federal Judge Jed Rakoff slashed Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp’s suit for reimbursement and indemnification against Flagstar Bank FSB alleging that defendant misrepresented the quality of some $900 million in mortgage-backed securities insured by AGM.

Two of the four-count complaint against Flagstar was cut by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, who partially granted and partially denied Flagstar’s motion to dismiss the case. 

Continue Reading

Reinsurer Must Prove Prejudice to Avoid Coverage Based on Late Notice

Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Global Reins. Corp. of Am. (E.D. Pa. May 23, 2011)

In a matter of first impression in Pennsylvania, a federal court in Pennsylvania held that a reinsurer must demonstrate prejudice in order to avoid its coverage obligation based on the cedant’s failure to comply with the reinsurance certificate’s notice provisions. In so holding, the court noted that Pennsylvania law does not favor forfeiture of coverage for a technical breach of the insurance contract, a maxim that also applies in the

Continue Reading

Insurer Sues To Block Coverage For Suits Involving Stolen Body Parts

State Automobile Ins. Co. v. Garzone Funeral Home Inc. E.D. Penn., May 27, 2011

Plaintiff insurer filed suit against defendant policyholder, seeking to avoid indemnity for a host of lawsuits over the harvesting and sale of body parts from bodies at the Philadelphia funeral home.  The underlying actions by the families of the deceased allege that defendants and others conspired to sell body parts of corpses. 

Plaintiff insurer files the current suit seeking an order declaring that it does not have a duty to defend

Continue Reading

Disqualification of Reinsured’s Attorney Matter for Judiciary, Not Arbitrator

Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. Munich Reins. Am., Inc. (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2011)

The district court for the Southern District of New York recently held that the issue of whether a law firm should be disqualified from representing a reinsured where the same law firm represented the reinsurer in a prior matter is one for the judiciary, not the arbitrators. The court found that the law firm was not disqualified from representing the reinsured in a subsequent arbitration because the two matters where not

Continue Reading

Excess Insurer Files Claim Against Reinsurer in Dispute Over Obligations Under Facultative Reinsurance Contract

ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Global Reinsurance Corp. of America (U.S. District Court, E.D. PA)

In a case removed to federal court from a Pennsylvania state court, a Pennsylvania excess insurer recently filed a claim against a New York reinsurer in a dispute over its obligations under a facultative reinsurance contract.  Unlike a typical treaty reinsurance contract, which reinsures multiple insurance policies written under certain circumstances, a facultative reinsurance contract reinsures a specific insurance policy.  The parties entered into such an agreement to

Continue Reading

Transfer of coverage dispute not warranted merely because related action is pending in different forum.

White Mountains Reinsurance Co. of America v. Travelers Cas. & Surety Co., Case No. 11 Civ. 390 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y., Apr. 13, 2011)

White Mountains filed an action against Travelers in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, seeking a declaratory judgment and alleging breach of contract in connection with certain reinsurance contracts. Travelers removed the matter to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction, then moved to transfer the action, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1404, to the District of Connecticut where Travelers

Continue Reading