Court Awards Attorneys’ Fees Arising from Enforcement of Arbitration Award

Gentle Wace Shipping S.A. v. Transfield Shipping Inc.

(S.D.N.Y. Feb. 16, 2010)

 

A federal judge has awarded attorneys’ fees to a party attempting to enforce a previously-determined arbitration award. In Gentle Wave, a panel of two members of the London Maritime Arbitrators Association issued an arbitration award in favor of petitioner Gentle Wave and against respondent Transfield. Transfield failed to pay the award, forcing Gentle Wave to commence an action to confirm the award, enter judgment, and award attorneys’ fees.

 

The court

Continue Reading

Service of Suit Provision Operates to Waive Serbian Reinsurer’s Removal Rights Despite Lack of Sophistication in U.S. Reinsurance Market

Dinallo v. Dunav Insurance Co.

(S.D.N.Y. February 1, 2010)

 

In a motion for reconsideration in the federal district court for the Southern District of New York, a Serbian reinsurance company sought reversal of an order remanding a suit to New York State supreme court.  The suit was brought by the New York Superintendant of Insurance in his capacity as Liquidator of Midland Insurance Company.  Between 1978 and 1980, Midland entered into four separate reinsurance contracts with the Serbian reinsurer.  Each of

Continue Reading

Accidental Death and Dismemberment Policy Covered Death Caused by Medical Malpractice

Barnes v. Am. Int'l Life Assur. Co(S.D.N.Y., February 4, 2010)

Insured under a group accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy died after a cathe was improperly inserted in her chest, causing cardiac arrest. The insurer denied the claim arguing medical malpractice did not coverage medical malpractice and that her death was the result of sickness or disease. The district court in New York held that the insured's death was unintentional and unexpected and, therefore, an accident entitling the surviving spouse to benefits under

Continue Reading

Insurers Not Responsible for Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

Jefferson Block 24 Oil & Gas LLC v. Aspen Ins. UK Ltd.

(E.D. La. January 29, 2010)

 

In November 2008, plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming that defendants were obligated to reimburse it for nearly $3 million in cleanup costs relating to an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  The leak occurred on November 2007 while plaintiff was testing a recently acquired pipeline.  Plaintiff responded to the leak from November 2007 until April 2008.  Plaintiff and its insurers disputed whether the pipeline

Continue Reading

Federal Court in PA Denies Motion to Enjoin Reinsurance Dispute; Allows Reinsurer’s Offset Argument to Remain

Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s

(E.D. Pa, January 11, 2010)

 

The instant action involves a reinsurance dispute where the two parties have filed a number of motions and cross-motion seeking injunctive relief and contempt of court regarding failure to paid monies owed.

 

The court denied both parties various motions.  First the court held that plaintiff’s cross-motion to enjoin a separate action pending in New York court based on the “first-filed” rule is without merit.  Specifically, the court held

Continue Reading

Cases for January 14, 2010 CaseWatch: Insurance

Cases Provided Courtesy of Lexis

Download American States Ins. Co. v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co. 

Download Amerisure Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hall Steel Co. 

Download Builders Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kalman dba Kalman Const. Corp.

Download Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA 

Download Derousse v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Download Erie Ins. Exchange v. Larrimore 

Download GEICO Indem. Ins. v. Progressive Ins. Co. 

Download GEICO Indem. Ins. v.

Continue Reading

“Aggregate” Limits of Multi-Year Commercial Excess Policies do not Apply on an Annual Basis

Union Carbide Corp. v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co.

(NY App. December 15, 2009)

A commercial policyholder sought a declaration that the stated aggregate limits of liability for multi-year excess policies apply on an annual basis. Each of the excess policies contained a declaration that specified a dollar amount as the "limit of liability" and states that the limit applies to each occurrence and "in the aggregate." The policyholder contended that, because the excess policies are silent as to whether the limit of liability is annualized, …

Continue Reading

Service of Suit Clause in Reinsurance Contract With Foreign Reinsurer Operates as a Waiver of the Reinsurer’s Right to Remove a Lawsuit to Federal Court

Dinallo v. Dunav Ins. Co.

(U.S. Dist. S.D.N.Y. November 19, 2009)

 

The Superintendant of Insurance of the State of New York, in his capacity as the liquidator of the insolvent Midland Insurance Company, filed suit against a Serbian reinsurance company.  The Superintendant alleges that, between November 1978 and October 1980, Midland and the defendant entered into four separate reinsurance treaties pertaining to certain insurance policies written by Midland.  Midland incurred various losses from claims on these policies that the Superintendant alleges were

Continue Reading

Insurer Ordered to Disclose Documents in Legionnaires’ Outbreak Case

Pentair Water Treatment (OH) Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.

(S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2009)

 

The District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered Continental Insurance Company to disclose various underwriting documents and produce underwriting witnesses in a dispute over insurance coverage for a cruise ship outbreak of Legionnaires’ Disease. In 1994, passengers on the cruise ship Horizon became ill after an outbreak of Legionnaire’s Disease. The outbreak was traced to the whirlpool spa on the vessel and, specifically to its filter, which had

Continue Reading

Second Circuit Won’t Rule on Constitutionality of NY Workers Comp Amendments

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hurlbut

(2nd Cir. (N.Y.) Nov. 4, 2009)

 

The Second Circuit refused to exercise federal jurisdiction over claims by Liberty Mutual that recent amendments to New York’s Workers Compensation Law are unconstitutional. Liberty’s claims stemmed from an amendment to the Workers Compensation Law that requires insurers to make deposits to an aggregate fund for all permanent partial disability cases. Another amendment bestows settlement authority for indemnity benefits on trustees of that aggregate fund. Liberty and its affiliates sued the

Continue Reading