Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. v. SGS Petroleum Service Corp.
(5th Cir., June 18, 2013)
This environmental coverage action arises from a dispute on as to the notice provision involving a pollution occurrence and whether the policyholder was required to show prejudice before denying coverage as required by a pollution buy-back provision in the policy.
Specifically, Starr’s excess coverage policy contained an absolute pollution exclusion clause. However, the parties negotiated a buy-back provision which deleted the original pollution exclusion and replaced it with a …
Continue Reading